distrust those people who change the discourse as social partners with whom . I recognize the wisdom of one who changes position after having an exchange of views.
Today I participated in weekly radio talk that a few weeks ago and I have been attending. The issue that all interventions have pivot has been the topic of the day: the commemoration of the day against gender violence.
summarize the most important points I think that we've played there:
- is deseamble this year was the last in which we had to carry out this commemoration.
- violence A "habitual" is added that generates the crisis. During the recession have been complaints and murders.
- The claims against gender violence / domestic / sexist are not exclusive to women, moreover, should be captained by men, the main perpetrators of this scourge.
- In recent years there has been significant progress in the path of intolerance, violence against women. What a few years ago were "a couple things" or "household dispute" has gradually become a cause for social rejection and denunciation to the authorities. However, there is still much more to advance.
- not so many years we have laws that make explicit mention gender violence. These are the measures that we left for the gamble. But we still take a feminist approach to why certain measures are proposed to take battered women escort? Why does not intend to be the abusers who are escorted? Who is more dangerous?
- is true that there are gender violence allegations false and used with a desire for personal gain. However they are a minority residual. Some say it is a very important number. And they say this as an argument to eliminate this law.
- Women are a very vulnerable group that deserves special protection. Are vulnerable because they are physically weaker than their abusers, are vulnerable because they have to fight against the inertia of cultural background and against a system that favors them.
- women's weakness is the weakness that the company wants to give it. How many women do not denounce their abusers or they do not leave because they have nothing? Those who do not are those who do not have a job to the dowry of independence to restart their life projects. Are the same who had to leave work to care for their offspring. Are the same ones who sacrificed their careers for family. Are the same as it played everything on one card and end up losing their lives.
- women's weakness is that the system provides them. They are not isolated cases of young women are not hired because of the risk of pregnancy or directly, which are not renewed by the pregnancy (although later alleging other reasons).
And what does this have to do with the murdered women? If these women had had other options, if they had the necessary resources have not suffered or were suffering physical or mental abuse.
In addition to the topics of the role of media and education (topics necessary) or the need to strengthen the criminal measures (A topic that I have too light for different reasons) we should talk about solutions that give root to the options battered women to stop being so clear. Let's talk about what services need to strengthen the government, how to be strengthened especially during the crisis. But we must also talk about what measures to take to femeninizar job offers, especially during the crisis.
I hope this is the last day against violence against women to celebrate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment